Re: [uml-devel] Re: [UML] Compile error when building with seperate source and object directories

On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 01:30:57PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> For now I've added an #ifdef to re-include that code for x86, while excluding 
> it for x86_64. Also, is that up-to-date wrt. 2.6.12-rc3?

Yes, it is.  As for the ptrace.c...  IMO the right thing is per-architecture
helper here.  Such ifdefs are OK when it's just i386 and amd64.  As soon
as e.g. uml/s390 gets merged or uml/ia64 and uml/ppc get resurrected...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [uml-devel] Re: [UML] Compile error when building with seperate source and object directories
  - From: Blaisorblade <[email protected]>

References:
- [UML] Compile error when building with seperate source and object directories
  - From: Ryan Anderson <[email protected]>
- Re: [UML] Compile error when building with seperate source and object directories
  - From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
- Re: [UML] Compile error when building with seperate source and object directories
  - From: Al Viro <[email protected]>
- Re: [uml-devel] Re: [UML] Compile error when building with seperate source and object directories
  - From: Blaisorblade <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.12-rc3-mm2: ppc pte_offset_map()
Next by Date: RE: Emulex fibre channel HBA support and SAN connection
Previous by thread: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [UML] Compile error when building with seperate source and object directories
Next by thread: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [UML] Compile error when building with seperate source and object directories
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]