"Artem B. Bityuckiy" <[email protected]> wrote: > > I assume I don't need to notify Andrew about the inconsistency in the > old patch, or should I? Nope, just send the new patch. Please be sure to include a complete and up-to-date explanation of what it does, and why - I haven't looked at this yet. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] VFS bugfix: two read_inode() calles without clear_inode() call between
- From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] VFS bugfix: two read_inode() calles without clear_inode() call between
- References:
- [PATCH] VFS bugfix: two read_inode() calles without clear_inode() call between
- From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] VFS bugfix: two read_inode() calles without clear_inode() call between
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] VFS bugfix: two read_inode() calles without clear_inode() call between
- From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] VFS bugfix: two read_inode() calles without clear_inode() call between
- From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] VFS bugfix: two read_inode() calles without clear_inode() call between
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] VFS bugfix: two read_inode() calles without clear_inode() call between
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/6]suspend/resume SMP support
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] VFS bugfix: two read_inode() calles without clear_inode() call between
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] VFS bugfix: two read_inode() calles without clear_inode() call between
- Index(es):
 |