Re: [PATCH] VFS bugfix: two read_inode() calles without clear_inode() call between

В Срд, 27/04/2005 в 17:57 +0200, Miklos Szeredi пишет:
> On second thought a wake_up_inode() seems to be missing in
> dispose_list() just before destroy_inode().  
Good point, thanks.

> Also I'm not sure delaying removal from i_sb_list is the right thing.
> generic_delete_inode() does this before clear_inode().
As I can see, dispose_list() doesn't correlate with generic_delete_inode
() code path, so this mustn't be a problem.

What am I supposed to do next? I already sent the old patch with the
error to Andrew Morton. Should I notify him about this? Just resend?
Whatever?

Cheers,
Artem.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem B. Bityuckiy,
St.-Petersburg, Russia.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH] VFS bugfix: two read_inode() calles without clear_inode() call between
    • From: "Artem B. Bityuckiy" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] VFS bugfix: two read_inode() calles without clear_inode() call between
    • From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] VFS bugfix: two read_inode() calles without clear_inode() call between
• Next by Date: Re: Panic on a BIOSless machine.
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] VFS bugfix: two read_inode() calles without clear_inode() call between
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] VFS bugfix: two read_inode() calles without clear_inode() call between
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]