On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 00:46 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > into callback queue. Hmm, might be useful if it was, for implementing > various kinds of in-kernel notifications. There was implementation for that, but I dropped it due to broken code [fix was simple, but there is issue number 2] and I think it may end up in various microkerel-alike message queues. Since I worked too much with projects that are based on such design, so I afraid it will be very bad to allow such using in Linux kernel. Although it can be compile-time or something... -- Evgeniy Polyakov Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- References:
- [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
- Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
- From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
- Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
- From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
- [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
- Prev by Date: Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
- Next by Date: Adaptec 2400A i2o + x86_64 doesn't work above 128G
- Previous by thread: Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
- Next by thread: Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
- Index(es):