Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.

On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 00:46 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

> into callback queue. Hmm, might be useful if it was, for implementing
> various kinds of in-kernel notifications.

There was implementation for that, but I dropped it due to broken code
[fix was simple, but there is issue number 2]
and I think it may end up in various microkerel-alike message queues.
Since I worked too much with projects that are based on such design,
so I afraid it will be very bad to allow such using in Linux kernel.
Although it can be compile-time or something...

-- 
        Evgeniy Polyakov

Crash is better than data corruption -- Arthur Grabowski

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

---

• References:
  • [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
    • From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
    • From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
• Next by Date: Adaptec 2400A i2o + x86_64 doesn't work above 128G
• Previous by thread: Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
• Next by thread: Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]