Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.

On Tuesday 26 April 2005 23:06, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> Let's clarify that we are talking about userspace->kernelspace
> direction.
> Only for that messages callback path is invoked.

What about kernelspace->userspace or kernelspace->kernelspace?
>From what I see nothing stops kernel code from calling cn_netlink_send,
in fact your cbus does exactly that. So I am confused why you singled
out userspace->kernelspace direction.

-- 
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
    • From: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
  • Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
    • From: Evgeniy Polyakov <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: pci-sysfs resource mmap broken (and PATCH)
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/7] dlm: recovery
• Previous by thread: Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
• Next by thread: Re: [1/1] connector/CBUS: new messaging subsystem. Revision number next.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]