Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 25 Apr 2005, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 07:08:28PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> > If you're checking in a change to 1000+ files, you're doing
> > something wrong.
> 
> arch or subsystem merge?

No, if it's a merge, you just suck in all the already-compressed objects.  

You never compress anything new - you get the objects, you update your
tree index, and you're done. No overhead anywhere - a clean merge may
_look_ like it's changing thousands of files, but it didn't change a
single _object_ anywhere, it just re-arranged the objects and created a
new view of them.

Most merges are literally just a tree-level thing. Sometimes you have to 
do a content merge, but that tends to be a file or two.

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux