Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks

On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 07:08:28PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> If you're checking in a change to 1000+ files, you're doing
> something wrong.

arch or subsystem merge?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
  - From: Andreas Gal <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

References:
- Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
  - From: Matt Mackall <[email protected]>
- Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: handle iret faults better
Next by Date: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Cogito-0.8 (former git-pasky, big changes!)
Previous by thread: Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
Next by thread: Re: Mercurial 0.3 vs git benchmarks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]