On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 09:07 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 14:57 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 08:49 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 09:30 +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > As long as they do not statically link against LGPL (or GPL) code and as
> > > > long as they do not link dynamically agaist GPL code. And there are
> > > > probably more rules .....
> > > >
> > >
> > > Actually, I believe that the LGPL allows for static linking as well.
> >
> > it does, as long as you provide the .o files of your own stuff so that
> > the end user can relink with say a bugfixed version of library.
>
> I don't see that in the license. As point 5 showed: "Such a
> work, in isolation, is not a derivative work of the Library, and
you missed the point "in isolation". If you do NOT link against the lib,
eg your app in isolation, you don't have to care abuot the LGPL. That is
what it says. The moment you do link you are no longer "in isolation".
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
