Re: GPL violation by CorAccess?

["Richard B. Johnson" <linux-os@analogic.com>]

On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, Chris Friesen wrote:

> Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> > Violation? They proudly reply in their article in
> >     http://www.linuxdevices.com
> > that they use Linux, that they embedded a version
> > of Red Hat, etc.
> >
> > It's likely that they didn't modify anything in the kernel and
> > just used some stripped-down C-libraries to make everything fit.
>
> Right.  They're distributing products licensed under the GPL, so
> sections 3-a and 3-b of the GPL apply.
>
> Thus they can either a) accompany it with the source code, or b)
> accompany it with a written offer to give any third party a copy of the
> source code.
>
> Chris

No. Accompany it with a written offer to __provide__ the source
code for any GPL stuff they used (like the kernel or drivers).
Anything at the application-level is NOT covered by the GPL.
They do not have to give away their trade-secrets.

Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.6.11 on an i686 machine (5537.79 BogoMips).
 Notice : All mail here is now cached for review by Dictator Bush.
                 98.36% of all statistics are fiction.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/