Re: poor SATA performance under 2.6.11 (with < 2.6.11 is OK)?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chris Wright wrote:
* Tomasz Chmielewski ([email protected]) wrote:

or should I wait for 2.6.11.7 (?), where it should be corrected?

well, indeed, a week ago or more :)


Wait, no longer, 2.6.11.7 has been here already ;-)  However, nothing in
this area was touched.  If there's an outstanding issue, please chase it
down, and if it's reasonable regression fix we can consider it for
the -stable tree.

OK so Tomasz Torch suggested that my drive was blacklisted somewhere after 2.6.8.1 (it's the last kernel on which I have good performance).

Does drive blacklisting = very poor performance?
And no drive blacklisting = good performance, and possibly data corruption?


Tomek
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux