Re: poor SATA performance under 2.6.11 (with < 2.6.11 is OK)?

* Tomasz Chmielewski ([email protected]) wrote:
> or should I wait for 2.6.11.7 (?), where it should be corrected?

Wait, no longer, 2.6.11.7 has been here already ;-)  However, nothing in
this area was touched.  If there's an outstanding issue, please chase it
down, and if it's reasonable regression fix we can consider it for
the -stable tree.

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: poor SATA performance under 2.6.11 (with < 2.6.11 is OK)?
  - From: Tomasz Chmielewski <[email protected]>

References:
- poor SATA performance under 2.6.11 (with < 2.6.11 is OK)?
  - From: Tomasz Chmielewski <[email protected]>
- Re: poor SATA performance under 2.6.11 (with < 2.6.11 is OK)?
  - From: Tomasz Torcz <[email protected]>
- Re: poor SATA performance under 2.6.11 (with < 2.6.11 is OK)?
  - From: Tomasz Chmielewski <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.11.7 ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet.
Next by Date: Re: [INFO] Kernel strict versioning
Previous by thread: Re: poor SATA performance under 2.6.11 (with < 2.6.11 is OK)?
Next by thread: Re: poor SATA performance under 2.6.11 (with < 2.6.11 is OK)?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]