Re: [CHECKER] possible missing capability check in ioctl function, drivers/net/cris/eth_v10.c, kernel 2.6.11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ted Kremenek wrote:
> Currently we are looking primarily into the 
> ioctls in drivers/net,

Just as a small aside, a little over five years ago (wow does time fly!) I
did a manual audit for mistakes like this:
  http://lkml.org/lkml/2000/3/7/156
Not sure if that's relevant to your work your not...I'm not sure how you
would can catch most of these errors statistically since a lot of the
dangerous ioctl's were only for a single device.

-Mitch
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux