Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > > Note that NFS checks the permissions on _both_ the client and server,
> > > for a reason.
> > 
> > Does it?  If I read the code correctly the client checks credentials
> > supplied by the server (or cached).  But the server does the actual
> > checking of permissions.
> > 
> > Am I missing something?
> 
> Yes, for NFSv2, this test in nfs_permssion():
> 
> 	if (!NFS_PROTO(inode)->access)
> 		goto out;

I've seen that, I just thought that was for some broken servers not
for all NFSv2 servers.

Anyway that's been fixed in NFSv3, so obviously the "permission
checking on both sides" wasn't optimal :)

> And for either version of NFS, if the uid and gid are non-zero, and
> the permission bits indicate that an access is permitted, then the
> client does not consult the server for permission.

Where's that?  I see no such check.

Thanks,
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux