On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 09:56:29PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > Well the sanity check on the "server" side is always enforced. You > can't "trick" sftp or ftp to not check permissions. So checking on > the "client" side too (where the fuse daemon is running) makes no > sense, does it? That argument doesn't make much sense to me. But we're at the end of my useful contributions to this discussion; I'm going to be quiet now and hope some folks who know more about filesystems have more useful responses. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- References:
- [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- From: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
- [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] ppc32: refactor FPU exception handling
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 4/5] sched: RCU sched domains
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC] FUSE permission modell (Was: fuse review bits)
- Index(es):
 |