Re: [Fwd: Re: connector is missing in 2.6.12-rc2-mm1]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 

On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:53:02 +1000
Herbert Xu <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes but what will go wrong on uni-processor MIPS when you don't do the
> sync in atomic_sub_return?

Indeed.  I see nothing in those quotes which indicate that the
SYNC is needed on uniprocessor.  It's only saying things such
as "SYNC only affects load and store instructions" and
"LL/SC can only be performed on cacheable memory".  Stuff
like that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux