Re: [PATCH] radeonfb: (#2) Implement proper workarounds for PLL accesses

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 00:35 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > Hrm... it should only add a few ms, maybe about 20 ms to the mode
> > switching... If you remove the radeon_msleep(5) call from the
> > radeon_pll_errata_after_data() routine in radeonfb.h, does it make a
> > difference ?
> 
> Yes, it does.  Without the sleep, switching is as fast as before.

It is weird tho. Could you try adding a printk or something to figure
out how much this is called during a typical swich ? It will seriously
spam your console though ... I would expect only 5 or 6 calls during a
normal switch (since the PLL value shouldn't change for a flat panel),
that is no more than maybe 50ms, while it seems you are having a much
bigger delay.

Ben.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux