Re: [PATCH] radeonfb: (#2) Implement proper workarounds for PLL accesses

Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]> writes:

> Hrm... it should only add a few ms, maybe about 20 ms to the mode
> switching... If you remove the radeon_msleep(5) call from the
> radeon_pll_errata_after_data() routine in radeonfb.h, does it make a
> difference ?

Yes, it does.  Without the sleep, switching is as fast as before.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [email protected]
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] radeonfb: (#2) Implement proper workarounds for PLL accesses
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] radeonfb: (#2) Implement proper workarounds for PLL accesses
    • From: Andreas Schwab <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] radeonfb: (#2) Implement proper workarounds for PLL accesses
    • From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.11.6 1/6] irq and pci_ids: patch for Intel ESB2
• Next by Date: Re: Kernel SCM saga..
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] radeonfb: (#2) Implement proper workarounds for PLL accesses
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] radeonfb: (#2) Implement proper workarounds for PLL accesses
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]