Re: connector.h

[Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>]

Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 17:31 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > 
> > > struct cb_id
> > > {
> > > 	__u32			idx;
> > > 	__u32			val;
> > > };
> > 
> > It is vital that all data structures be skilfully commented - they are the
> > key to understanding the code.  Why the struct exists, which actor passes
> > it to which other actor(s), whether the data structure is communicated with
> > userspace, what other data structures it is aggregated with or linked to,
> > locking rules, etc.
> 
> It is described in Documentation/connector/connector.txt.
> Should it also be placed here?

I think it's better to document these things in the code.  Those structs
which are communicated to userspace should be described in connector.txt
because they are part of the API.  But a lot of the structs you have there
are purely knerel-internal.

> > > struct cn_msg
> > > {
> > 
> > Please do
> >
> > 	struct cn_msg {
> 
> Neither structure declaration should have opening brace on the new
> string?

I don't understand your question.

We lay out struct definitions thusly:

struct foo {
	int a;
	int b;
};


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/