* Mark Gross <[email protected]> wrote:
> BTW:
>
> My work on this has been mostly in the context of a 2.6 kernel based
> generalization of a softIRQ as thread patch for 2.4 that enables
> priority tuning of the bottom half processing as well as /proc support
> for turning on and off the feature. We got it to work.
>
> However; I don't know what good workloads and metrics to measure the
> goodness of the work look like. If folks think priority tuning of
> bottom half processing is worth persuing and can help me quantify its
> effectiveness better than running a jitter test while doing a BONNIE
> test run on a SCSI JBOD, then I'm happy to do more with this.
anything that generates a consistent interrupt rate is pretty good for
testing. Networking is the most softirq-dependent code, so i'd say
tbench over a real network ought to be a good benchmark.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
