* Mark Gross <[email protected]> wrote:
> > As I mentioned earlier, what would it take to be able to group
> > softirq threads that should not preempt each other, but still keep
> > preemption available for other threads?
>
> It would only take the creationt of multiple softIRQd threads per CPU.
> Just keep net_rx and net_tx in the same work queue.
we could work around the net_rx/net_tx assumptions by moving them to the
same softirq thread - but i'm a bit uneasy about the whole concept: e.g.
how about SCSI softirq processing and timer softirq processing, can they
preempt each other?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
