Re: linux-libc-headers scsi headers vs libc scsi headers

[Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>]

On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, DervishD wrote:

> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:17:26 +0200
> From: DervishD <lkml@dervishd.net>
> To: Mariusz Mazur <mmazur@kernel.pl>
> Cc: Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: linux-libc-headers scsi headers vs libc scsi headers
> 
>     Hi Mariusz :)
> 
>  * Mariusz Mazur <mmazur@kernel.pl> dixit:
> > >     I don't know which set of headers will work, and in fact I don't
> > > know if I must follow 'Linux From Scratch' advice and use raw kernel
> > > headers for building glibc and LLH headers for any other thing. I
> > > think I probably will use the LLH headers (including scsi) for
> > > everything since glibc passes the 'make check' doing that... If I
> > > screw my system badly, I have lotsa backups at hand.
> > Like I've said, you're unable to break your system this way.
> 
>     I think so... 
> 
> > And I don't see any point in LFS suggesting using raw kernel
> > headers to compile glibc
> 
>     I don't know their reasons because I haven't read any rationale
> (if any exists at all). Anyway, I've used LLH (including the scsi


http://uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0007.3/0587.html seems to have a 
bearing on what you are discussing - just FYI.


-- 
Jesper Juhl

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/