On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, DervishD wrote:
> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:17:26 +0200
> From: DervishD <[email protected]>
> To: Mariusz Mazur <[email protected]>
> Cc: Linux-kernel <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: linux-libc-headers scsi headers vs libc scsi headers
>
> Hi Mariusz :)
>
> * Mariusz Mazur <[email protected]> dixit:
> > > I don't know which set of headers will work, and in fact I don't
> > > know if I must follow 'Linux From Scratch' advice and use raw kernel
> > > headers for building glibc and LLH headers for any other thing. I
> > > think I probably will use the LLH headers (including scsi) for
> > > everything since glibc passes the 'make check' doing that... If I
> > > screw my system badly, I have lotsa backups at hand.
> > Like I've said, you're unable to break your system this way.
>
> I think so...
>
> > And I don't see any point in LFS suggesting using raw kernel
> > headers to compile glibc
>
> I don't know their reasons because I haven't read any rationale
> (if any exists at all). Anyway, I've used LLH (including the scsi
http://uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0007.3/0587.html seems to have a
bearing on what you are discussing - just FYI.
--
Jesper Juhl
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
