Re: NFS client latencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



to den 31.03.2005 Klokka 16:54 (+0200) skreiv Ingo Molnar:

> i think it's incorrect in its current form, because 'pos' is not 
> necessarily safe and might be removed from the commit_list?

Right.

> the whole loop could be a "while (!list_empty(head))" thing, if it wasnt 
> for the possibility for an nfs_set_page_writeback_locked() to skip an 
> entry. Maybe a local list of 'already processed' requests should be 
> built, and once the main list is emptied, moved back into the main list? 
> Then the lock-break could be moved to the end of the loop.

Should be pretty much unnecessary. See my previous email.

Cheers,
  Trond
-- 
Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux