Re: NFS client latencies

* Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> wrote:

> could you check the -41-23 -RT kernel at the usual place:
> 
>    http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
> 
> i've added Trond's radix lookup code, plus the lockbreaker patch.
> 
> (one thing that is not covered yet is nfs_scan_list() - that still scans 
> a list. Trond, is that fixable too?)

ok, find a new latency trace attached (1.6 msecs). I generated write 
loads, and the nfs_scan_list_dirty() latency is gone and indeed 
nfs_scan_list() generates the worst latency - while processing 8535 
pages in one critical section.

	Ingo

Attachment: nfs-1682us-latency.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: NFS client latencies
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• References:
  • NFS client latencies
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: NFS client latencies
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: NFS client latencies
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: NFS client latencies
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: NFS client latencies
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: NFS client latencies
    • From: Trond Myklebust <[email protected]>
  • Re: NFS client latencies
    • From: Lee Revell <[email protected]>
  • Re: NFS client latencies
    • From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [RFC/PATCH] network configs: disconnect network options from drivers
• Next by Date: Re: Latency tests with 2.6.12-rc1
• Previous by thread: Re: NFS client latencies
• Next by thread: Re: NFS client latencies
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]