* Lee Revell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Yes. Together with the radix tree-based sorting of dirty requests,
> > that's pretty much what I've spent most of today doing. Lee, could you
> > see how the attached combined patch changes your latency numbers?
>
> Different code path, and the latency is worse. See the attached ~7ms
> trace.
could you check the -41-23 -RT kernel at the usual place:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
i've added Trond's radix lookup code, plus the lockbreaker patch.
(one thing that is not covered yet is nfs_scan_list() - that still scans
a list. Trond, is that fixable too?)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
