Re: [patch 1/2] fork_connector: add a fork connector

[Paul Jackson <pj@engr.sgi.com>]

Guillaume wrote:
>   I'm sorry but I really don't understand why you're speaking about
> accounting when I present results about fork connector. I agree that
> ELSA is using the fork connector but the fork connector has nothing to
> do with accounting.

True - sorry.  I kinda hijacked your thread.  I had fork_connector
associated in my mind with process accounting, so made the leap from
analyzing the fork_connector mechanism on its own merit, to analyzing
whether it was useful for collecting the new process accounting
information that was needed from forks.

In my own defense, I don't see where the motivations for fork_connector
are spelled out in the presentation to this patch, and it seems that
the other potential uses of it are less well explored at this point.

So I think my leap was a small one ;).

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <pj@engr.sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/