On Tue, 2005-03-29 at 07:35 -0800, Paul Jackson wrote:
> Guillaume wrote:
> > I ran some test using the CBUS instead of the cn_netlink_send() routine
> > and the overhead is nearly 0%:
>
> Overhead of what? Does this include merging the data and getting it to
> disk?
I test the overhead of sending the fork information to a user space
application. The merge of the data is done later and it has nothing to
do with the fork connector...
> Am I even asking the right question here - is it true that this data,
> when collected for accounting purposes, needs to go to disk, and that
> summarizing and analyzing the data is done 'off-line', perhaps hours
> later? That's the way it was 25 years ago ... but perhaps the basic
> data flow appropriate for accounting has changed since then.
Accounting is another problem and, as you said previously, summarizing
and analyzing the data is done later.
I'm sorry but I really don't understand why you're speaking about
accounting when I present results about fork connector. I agree that
ELSA is using the fork connector but the fork connector has nothing to
do with accounting.
Regards,
Guillaume
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
