> So you are saying that a stand alone section of code, that needs
> wrappers to work with Linux is a derived work of Linux?
Not what I said.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- References:
- Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- From: Horst von Brand <[email protected]>
- Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>
- Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
- Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] typo fix in Documentation/eisa.txt
- Next by Date: Re: [patch] posix-cpu-timers and cputime_t divisons.
- Previous by thread: Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- Next by thread: Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
- Index(es):
 |