Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.

> Writing code that needs wrappers is not derived work, if that code can
> also have wrappers for BSD, QNX and perhaps Windows. 

Just because it works with another O.S. doesn't mean it is not derived
from Linux code.  Good grief.  Try your lawyer, or at least a Google
search for something like "copyright derived work", for a better idea
of what "derived" means.

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.650.933.1373, 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
    • From: Horst von Brand <[email protected]>
  • Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>
  • Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
    • From: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc1-mm3 3/3] perfctr: mapped state cleanup: common
• Next by Date: Re: read() on relayfs channel returns premature 0
• Previous by thread: Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
• Next by thread: Re: Can't use SYSFS for "Proprietry" driver modules !!!.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]