On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> I've noticed the following situation which is caused by __up_mutex
> assigning an owner right away.
>
I also see this with non rt tasks causing a burst of schedules.
1. Process A runs and grabs lock L. then finishes its time slice.
2. Process B runs and tries to grab Lock L.
3. Process A runs and releases lock L.
4. __up_mutex gives process B lock L.
5. Process A tries to grab lock L.
6. Process B runs and releases lock L.
7. __up_mutex gives lock L to process A.
8. Process B tries to grab lock L again.
9. Process A runs...
Here we have more unnecessary schedules. So the condition to grab a lock
should be:
1. not owned.
2. partially owned, and the owner is not RT.
3. partially owned but the owner is RT and so is the grabber, and the
grabber's priority is >= the owner's priority.
-- Steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
