Re: Patch for inconsistent recording of block device statistics

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 23 2005, Mark Seger wrote:
> 
> >>re: your patch - I did try it on both an Operton and Xeon box.  It 
> >>worked find on the Opeteron and reported 0 for all the sectors on the 
> >>Xeon.  If nothing immediately jumps to your mind could it have been 
> >>something I did wrong?  I'll try another build after I send this along, 
> >>but I don't see how that will help as I did the first one from a brand 
> >>new source kit.
> >>   
> >>
> >
> >Sounds very strange, it is generic code so should work for all.
> >Different storage?
> > 
> >
> Works fine now.  Obviously I screwed up something and just wanted to let 
> you know it was cockpit error on my end.
> Is your plan to move this into some future kernel?  Do you need anything 
> more from me at this point?

Yes, I will make sure it gets committed. Thanks for your help so far.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux