On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 15:27 +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
> On 2005/03/23 15:23, Natanael Copa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 14:53 +0100, Max Kellermann wrote:
> > > The number of processes is counted per user, but CPU time and memory
> > > consumption is counted per process.
> >
> > So limiting maximum number of processes will automatically limit CPU
> > time and memory consumption per user?
>
> No. I was talking about RLIMIT_CPU and RLIMIT_DATA, compared to
> RLIMIT_NPROC. RLIMIT_NPROC limits the number of processes for that
> user, nothing else (slightly simplified explanation).
Yes, but if
RLIMIT_NPROC is per user and RLIMIT_CPU is per proc
the theoretical CPU limit per user is RLIMIT_NPROC * RLIMIT_CPU. So if
you half the RLIMIT_NPROC you will half the theoretical maximum CPU
limit per user.
Same with memory.
I don't know if that really solves anything, but a misbehaving process
(fork bomb) would need to consume the double RAM or CPU to do the same
"damage" if RLIMIT_NPROC is halved.
--
Natanael Copa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
