Re: forkbombing Linux distributions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2005/03/22 12:49, Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]> wrote:
> What if the few procs that he may spawn also grab so much memory so
> your machine disappears in swap-t(h)rashing?

The number of processes is counted per user, but CPU time and memory
consumption is counted per process.

Going around RLIMIT_CPU is too easy by simply forkbombing. This
renders RLIMIT_CPU unusable.

The memory limits aren't good enough either: if you set them low
enough that memory-forkbombs are unperilous for
RLIMIT_NPROC*RLIMIT_DATA, it's probably too low for serious
applications.

Now what about per-user (or per-session) CPU and memory limits?

Another idea: RLIMIT_FORK (number of allowed fork() calls in that
session). While that may not be useful for interactive login sessions,
I can imagine several situations where it could help (like qmail child
processes).

Max

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux