On Wed, 2005-03-23 at 08:23, Thomas Graf wrote:
>
> kfree simply does nothing if it is given a null pointer so that
> goto rtattr_failure for t == NULL is handled just fine without
> a check. I will never get used to this behaviour and policy as
> well though, it somewhat makes code less readable.
>
I cant get used to it either; actually i dont think i would be able
to stop my fingers ;->
> > didnt understand the janitor part.
>
> It will probably be removed again by one of the regular 'remove
> unnecessary pre kfree checks' patchsets.
>
Yes, already Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]> has made that
point - although he did not post to netdev!! ;->
So ignore my comment Herbert
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
