On 07/19/2010 01:18 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote: > On Monday 19 July 2010 01:01 AM, Christofer C. Bell wrote: >>> Would you say use of noscript or flashblock would be a good compromise? >>>> If not what are my other options? (maybe I should start a new thread for >>>> this discussion) >>>> >> I think FlashBlock would be a fairly good compromise. If you're using >> FlashBlock, you can safely wander around the web knowing that no flash you >> do not explicitly authorize will be running. As for NoScript, I'm not sure >> that it adds value for this specific issue, but I certainly run it anyway >> (and not for security reasons). > Thanks for your opinion Chris. Much appreciated. :) I had noscript installed but it broke several websites, including youtube. Several links in youtube would cease to work. I could no longer play youtube vids. Perhaps I misconfigured it??? -- users mailing list users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
