2009/7/20 Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Sun, 19 Jul 2009, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > >> 2009/7/19 Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> [snip] >> > but i'm starting to wonder if this is worth the trouble, how much >> > *more* i?86 content i'll have to dump on this machine and, most >> > importantly, should this be my concern or do i have the right to at >> > least *suggest* that the software providers might consider supplying a >> > 64-bit toolchain to avoid all this nonsense, for the sake of the >> > increasing number of 64-bit systems out there? >> >> I think they're working on porting to 64 bit, but it's a fair bit of >> work. >> >> If you don't like installing so much i386 packages you could >> consider using a mock chroot sandbox, to avoid contaminating" your >> main system. >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/MockTricks#Using_mock_as_a_chroot_sandbox_tool > > i may just throw 32-bit f11 on via virtualbox and do it all there. > That works too. Or qemu-kvm which is available in the fedora repos. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
