On Thursday 25 June 2009 13:53:43 John Aldrich wrote: > On Thursday 25 June 2009, Kevin Bowling wrote: > > 2 out of 5 failures. F10->F11 is completely unusable for any kind of > > "uncommon" setup, i.e. LDAP login, Linux RAID, Xen DomU. Anything other > > than one IDE hard disk with default layout really. > > > > It worked well in the past, it doesn't now. Just a heads up since > > nobody bothered mentioning this beforehand. It should probably be added > > to "common bugs" and in a big banner on the release notes. > > Well, F10 ->F11 worked fine for me. However, I let F10 update itself to > F11. I was prompted that there was a new version of Fedora available and > did I want to install it? I allowed Fedora to upgrade itself and everything > went smoothly. I have a total of 3 HDDs in this system and do NOT have a > standard layout. > > So, I think the phrase YMMV is appropriate here. That being said, I think > that, yes, there may be some things that break in an upgrade like this, but > it should be relatively easy to fix, I would think. Common sense says to > back up any crucial config files in case they are overwritten. I used the same method and it has been a horrendous job to sort it out. I had been using repos like updates-testing and kde-fedora's similar one and it looks as though that may have caused a lot of the problems. Anne -- New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org Just found a cool new feature? Add it to UserBase
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
