Re: Can't update F9

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: Can't update F9
• From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 02:25:18 +0200
• References: <ec0de77f0905110822u1f52afd5l4ae3931f0c9120eb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A0852D0.3090304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ec0de77f0905111210q21e43862ofd069117a9ca72ca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A08A0A2.1070308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20090511232833.GD4433@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KNode/0.10.9

Todd Zullinger wrote:
> The F9 repos were recently (in the past week) updated to use sha256
> hashes for the repodata.

No. Only F11 uses SHA256. The F9 and F10 repos still use the old checksums
(SHA1 in the repodata, MD5 in most other places, e.g. checksums within the
RPMs).

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Can't update F9
    • From: Todd Zullinger

• References:
  • Can't update F9
    • From: Alan Evans
  • Re: Can't update F9
    • From: Mikkel L. Ellertson
  • Re: Can't update F9
    • From: Alan Evans
  • Re: Can't update F9
    • From: Mikkel L. Ellertson
  • Re: Can't update F9
    • From: Todd Zullinger

• Prev by Date: Re: Fedora 10 and libresmgr.so.1
• Next by Date: Re: Not authorised to mount internal disks?
• Previous by thread: Re: Can't update F9
• Next by thread: Re: Can't update F9
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread