Re: java again really

• To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: java again really
• From: Peter Boy <pboy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:44:20 +0100
• In-reply-to: <478122A3.5070405@xxxxxxxxx>
• References: <202269.79752.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <477E91E9.9020906@xxxxxxxxxx> <477E9AD3.5010301@xxxxxxxxx> <1199497546.2952.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <477EEE6B.2040403@xxxxxxxxx> <1199528596.2982.19.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <477FC425.3040907@xxxxxxxxx> <1199568492.2982.47.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <478004CD.30406@xxxxxxxxx> <1199573868.26310.796.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47808771.5060708@xxxxxxxxx> <1199623266.26310.913.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <478122A3.5070405@xxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

Am Sonntag, den 06.01.2008, 12:49 -0600 schrieb Les Mikesell:
> If their courses continue to diverge in 
> ways like the Sun jvm inclusion in RHEL, jpackage breakage in fedora 

Again, there is NO jpackage breakage in Fedora, and the way RHEL and
Fedora integrate Java is just the same (as is the same in SuSE/SLES).

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: java again really
    • From: Les Mikesell
  • Re: java again really
    • From: Craig White

• References:
  • Re: java again really
    • From: Antonio Olivares
  • Re: java again really
    • From: Karl Larsen
  • Re: java again really
    • From: Les Mikesell
  • Re: java again really
    • From: Peter Boy
  • Re: java again really
    • From: Les Mikesell
  • Re: java again really
    • From: Peter Boy
  • Re: java again really
    • From: Les Mikesell
  • Re: java again really
    • From: Peter Boy
  • Re: java again really
    • From: Les Mikesell
  • Re: java again really
    • From: Craig White
  • Re: java again really
    • From: Les Mikesell
  • Re: java again really
    • From: Craig White
  • Re: java again really
    • From: Les Mikesell

• Prev by Date: Re: OT: Apple list?
• Next by Date: Re: HTTP Bad Request 400 - apache on Fedora 8
• Previous by thread: Re: java again really
• Next by thread: Re: java again really
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread