Re: Feature Request "secure by default"

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: Feature Request "secure by default"
• From: Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 02:07:14 +0200
• Organization: Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
• References: <648d054e0706100611i67c76721rabd711494238a57a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200706101550.23136.manuel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <648d054e0706100906x144d31ddjb96a13a6d099f385@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <slrnf6op4l.kpo.mcepl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <648d054e0706110532x22097a81wa470c78528081d10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: slrn/0.9.8.1pl2 (Linux)

On 2007-06-11, 12:32 GMT, Simon Jolle wrote:
> It is too complicated. Nobody have the knowledge to deploy 
> custom SELinux profiles. We run third-party applications like 
> Websphere, Oracle and other proprietary stuff.

It's hard to believe that we don't have a policy for stuff like 
that -- after all these are our biggest customers' apps (I 
suppose). Chmm, strange.

Matej

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Feature Request "secure by default"
    • From: Rahul Sundaram

• References:
  • Feature Request "secure by default"
    • From: Simon Jolle
  • Re: Feature Request "secure by default"
    • From: Manuel Arostegui Ramirez
  • Re: Feature Request "secure by default"
    • From: Simon Jolle
  • Re: Feature Request "secure by default"
    • From: Matej Cepl
  • Re: Feature Request "secure by default"
    • From: Simon Jolle

• Prev by Date: Re: where is FC7 yumex?
• Next by Date: Re: two questions from a novice
• Previous by thread: Re: Feature Request "secure by default"
• Next by thread: Re: Feature Request "secure by default"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread