Re: FC5. Problem activating eth1 instead of eth0.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 27 Jun 2006, Nat Gross wrote:

On 6/27/06, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 13:59 -0400, Nat Gross wrote:
> >
> SOLVED!! I suddenly remembered that a long time ago, when I had
> network problems, I SHUT DOWN the ROUTERS, after changing nics (or
> whatever it was then). So, this is what I did now, and voila!
> Thank you all, and hope this helps.
> -nat
> ps. um Forgot to methion I also turned the routers back on<g>.

Routers tend to cache the arp associations (tcp/mac) for a
much longer time than other equipment - perhaps 20 minutes.
With Cisco's you can log into them and use the command
'clear arp' instead of restarting - other routers probably
have similar commands.

****** ALAS! IT STRUCK AGAIN! IT *IS* the KERNEL! ********************
Upon a subsequent reboot (why did I reboot!!), I went thru the
rigmarole all over again. In the past 8 hours of more tinkering, I
have ascertained that my original eth0 card works as well, if I shut
off the system and reboot the old kernel. But the old kernel gives me
some ati related problems (it's the first kernel shipped with FC5).
Anyhow, on another machine, I also have FC5 and this latest kernel,
but only one nic physically installed, and have NO problems.
So, the question is, can I totally HIDE the eth1 nic from the os,
as-if it didn't exist?
Thanks;
nat

Just curious: Have you installed the initscripts RPM from updates-testing as I suggested in another thread?

--
		Matthew Saltzman

Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux