Re: SElinux

• To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: SElinux
• From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sun, 02 Apr 2006 13:20:43 -0500
• In-reply-to: <1143990250.7569.40.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <442F144D.1010601@xxxxxxxxx> <1143936629.1432.77.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f84880b00604011748y7b392311q8a48976f84213c5a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1143947511.1432.105.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0604020605390.25662@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1143990250.7569.40.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>

On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 10:04, Craig White wrote:

> As for SELinux making a system 'unstable' - I can't envision a scenario
> that SELinux would do that. 

Frequency of updates is a good metric for stability.  How many
SELinux updates have been issued since it was experimentally
included in fedora?

-- 
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SElinux
    • From: Rahul Sundaram
  • Re: SElinux
    • From: Benjamin Franz
  • Re: SElinux
    • From: Craig White

• References:
  • SElinux
    • From: Caser
  • Re: SElinux
    • From: Craig White
  • Re: SElinux
    • From: Kam Leo
  • Re: SElinux
    • From: Craig White
  • Re: SElinux
    • From: Benjamin Franz
  • Re: SElinux
    • From: Craig White

• Prev by Date: Re: Suddently problem writing DVD data
• Next by Date: Re: FC5 Gtk fonts -- not as nice as FC4?
• Previous by thread: Re: SElinux
• Next by thread: Re: SElinux
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread