Les Mikesell wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-01 at 11:59, Mike McCarty wrote:
This is a common misconception. Windows is often portrayed as a cycle
hog. Since doing benchmarks is one of my hobbies (I dunno why), I have
run benchmarks on about a dozen machines I own, with three or on some
even five different OS installed. Windows is not a cycle hog.
Until you try to do something... Benchmark the time to create a new
process on windows vs.about anything else, or the time wasted
in context switching among them.
By far the slowest machine/OS combination I have is Linux (FC2) on
my fastest (2.7GHz) machine. Windows XP on that same machine is
noticeably faster (not just measurably faster).
As an example, I just "right clicked" on my desktop, and it took
five (5) seconds for the menu to pop up. Selecting "open terminal"
took ten (10) seconds before first prompt. I have no unusual scripts
which run at terminal startup. Windows XP is much faster in starting
a console window.
I just opened Open Office "Writer Word Processor", and it took
thirty nine (39) seconds to initialize.
Mike
--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
