Re: OT: Email signing

• To: mhw@xxxxxxxxxxxx, For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Subject: Re: OT: Email signing
• From: Anne Wilson <cannewilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:58:19 +0000
• Cc:
• In-reply-to: <1138740217.6573.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• References: <16de708d0601301914w441e508cg303a4fe6531efcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1138739542.6573.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1138740217.6573.27.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KMail/1.8

On Tuesday 31 Jan 2006 20:43, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> Message was signed with key 0x1E3CC7593760ABB4.
>  
> Status: Bad signature.
>   Message was signed by 73517.757@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Key ID:
> 0xE1C94B46DF1DD471). The signature is valid, but the key's validity
> is unknown.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302 (http://counter.li.org/)

• References:
  • OT: Email signing
    • From: Arthur Pemberton
  • Re: OT: Email signing
    • From: Michael H. Warfield
  • Re: OT: Email signing
    • From: Michael H. Warfield

• Prev by Date: hylafax
• Next by Date: Re: OT: Email signing
• Previous by thread: Re: OT: Email signing
• Next by thread: Re: OT: Email signing
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread