Re: Why Fedora ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 12:55 PM -0500 11/2/05, Derek Martin wrote:
>Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
>	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WkHPBKJ2pKcVUM5H"
>Content-Disposition: inline
>
>On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 12:33:48PM -0500, Robert Locke wrote:
>> I've been trying to ignore this thread, but Derek,
>>
>> Next time try clicking on the link that Rahul provided (before
>> assuming), which just to repeat was:
>
>Well, I don't mean to be rude, but simply put, no.  If one were to
>follow every link that someone posted in a thread they were
>participating in, they would never leave the computer.  There would be
>time for nothing else in the day.

Now that you've made foolish posts on this twice, I will tell you /do/
/not/ /respond/ /to/ /posts/ /you/ /haven't/ /read/.  If you don't read a
post you have no place posting a response.  Or two.


>If you want people to read links that you post, it would be helpful if
>you provided some clue as to what information is there, and/or why you
>want them to look at it.  If you don't want to do that, fine... but
>you shouldn't expect that people will necessarily follow your links
>either.

Get a clue yourself or /be/ /quiet/.
____________________________________________________________________
TonyN.:'                       <mailto:tonynelson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
      '                              <http://www.georgeanelson.com/>


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux