On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 08:33 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 07:27 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > > On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 17:19 -0300, George N. White III wrote: > > > Why is SpamAssassin giving messages in this thread a high score (I've > > > looked at 3 headers, two from the same author, all got the same score): > > > > > > X-Is-Spam: Yes, SpamAssassin (score=5.752, required 5, AWL -0.75, > > > BAYES_99 4.50, LONG_SUBJECT 2.00) > > > X-MailScanner-SpamScore: sssss > > > The thread seems to be triggering the BAYES_99 rule (very likely spam) > > on your system, whereas here it's hitting the BAYES_00 rule... > ... indicates that your Bayes filter is not trained correctly > ... or (also not unlikely) you are facing the limitation of Bayes > filtering. Possibly, though I have the redhat lists whitelisted and hence all the posts on those lists get added as ham to the database. Paul. -- Paul Howarth <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
