Am Di, den 19.07.2005 schrieb Olaf Mueller um 19:11: > Alexander Dalloz wrote: > > > Am Di, den 19.07.2005 schrieb Olaf Mueller um 16:02: > >> it seems to me that the key under > >> /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora in fc4 is not valid for > >> ghostscript-fonts-5.50-13. Can anybody confirm this? > > > The package is signed with the wrong key. IIRC it is the rawhide key. > Thank you, Alexander. Here is the key output from my package: > $ rpm -qi ghostscript-fonts | grep Key > Signature : DSA/SHA1, Wed 05 Jan 2005 10:27:52 PM CET, Key ID > 219180cddb42a60e > > I am just wondering how this could be? A few packages of FC4 are signed with the wrong key by accident. Sorry, I can't tell you more. > Olaf Alexander -- Alexander Dalloz | Enger, Germany | GPG http://pgp.mit.edu 0xB366A773 legal statement: http://www.uni-x.org/legal.html Fedora Core 2 GNU/Linux on Athlon with kernel 2.6.11-1.35_FC2smp Serendipity 00:27:39 up 4 days, 5:00, load average: 0.35, 0.35, 0.28
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
