Re: public key not available for ghostscript-fonts

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: public key not available for ghostscript-fonts
• From: Olaf Mueller <daily-planet@xxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:11:07 +0200
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• Newsgroups: istari.mlist.fedora-list
• Organization: Istari Networks
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: KNode/0.9.1

Alexander Dalloz wrote:

> Am Di, den 19.07.2005 schrieb Olaf Mueller um 16:02: 
>> it seems to me that the key under
>> /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora in fc4 is not valid for
>> ghostscript-fonts-5.50-13. Can anybody confirm this?

> The package is signed with the wrong key. IIRC it is the rawhide key.
Thank you, Alexander. Here is the key output from my package:
$ rpm -qi ghostscript-fonts | grep Key
Signature   : DSA/SHA1, Wed 05 Jan 2005 10:27:52 PM CET, Key ID
219180cddb42a60e

I am just wondering how this could be?


regards
Olaf

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: public key not available for ghostscript-fonts
    • From: Alexander Dalloz

• References:
  • public key not available for ghostscript-fonts
    • From: Olaf Mueller
  • Re: public key not available for ghostscript-fonts
    • From: Alexander Dalloz

• Prev by Date: FC4 / java / bin files
• Next by Date: Re: converting .php files to .dhtml
• Previous by thread: Re: public key not available for ghostscript-fonts
• Next by thread: Re: public key not available for ghostscript-fonts
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread