Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;

• To: fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx
• Subject: Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;
• From: "William Hooper" <whooperhsd3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 13:42:48 -0400 (EDT)
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• List-archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list>
• List-help: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=help>
• List-id: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list.redhat.com>
• List-post: <mailto:[email protected]>
• List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=subscribe>
• List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list>, <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
• Reply-to: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
• User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 [CVS]

Matthew Saltzman wrote:
[snip]
> "rpm --import" the appropriate GPG keys from /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/ and try
> again.
>
> It would be nice if the first use of up2date would do this, at least for
> RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora and RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-extras.

Sounds like a regression from FC3.  Anyone bothered to file a bug yet?

-- 
William Hooper

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;
    • From: Jeff Vian

• References:
  • Red hat network Updates Not Signed;
    • From: Mirco Scaramucci
  • Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;
    • From: Matthew Saltzman

• Prev by Date: Re: Did I make a mistake in starting with Fedora Core 4?
• Next by Date: RE: Fedora Compatible ISP
• Previous by thread: Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;
• Next by thread: Re: Red hat network Updates Not Signed;
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread