Humor - Just ignore

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Q: How many Fedora Mail List Subscribers does it take to change a lightbulb?
A: 993: (ported to Fedora by Grimbold Weps [1])

   * 23 to complain to -devel about the lights being out;
* 4 to claim that it is a configuration problem, and that such matters really belong on -user; * 3 to submit bugs about it, one of which has priority "grave" and consists only of "it's dark"; * 1 to do an untested NMU which breaks unstable, then ask around on #debian how to remove it five minutes later; * 8 to flame the bugs report submitters for not including patches in their bugs reports;
   * 5 to complain about unstable being broken;
* 31 to answer that it works for them, and they must have apt-get upgraded at a bad time;
   * 1 to post a patch for a new lightbulb to -project;
* 1 to complain that he had patches for this three years ago, but when he sent them to -devel they were just ignored, and he has had bad experiences with the BTS; besides, the proposed new lightbulb is non-reflexive; * 73 to scream that lightbulbs do not belong in the base system, that maintainers have no right to do things like this without prior discussion, and WHAT IS THE RM DOING ABOUT IT!?
   * 200 to complain about the length of the release cycle;
   * 3 to point out that the patch violates policy;
   * 17 to complain that the proposed new lightbulb is not under GPL;
* 353 to engage in a flame war about the comparative advantages of the GPL, the BSD license, the MIT license, the NPL, and the personal hygiene of unnamed FSF founders;
   * 7 to move various portions of the thread to -legal and -hurd;
* 1 to upload the suggested lightbulb, even though it shines dimmer than the old one; * 2 to file a furious flame of a bugs report, arguing that testing is better off in the dark than with a dim lightbulb; * 46 to argue vociferously about the bugs report about the dim lightbulb and demanding a statement from ftpmaster; * 11 to request a smaller lightbulb so it will fit their Tamagotchi if we ever decide to port Debian to that platform; * 73 to complain about the SNR on -devel and -qa and unsubscribe in protest; * 13 to post "unsubscribe", "How do I unsubscribe?", or "Please remove me from the list", followed by the usual footer; * 1 to upload a working lightbulb while everybody is too busy flaming everybody else to notice; * 31 to point out that the new lightbulb would shine 0.364% brighter if compiled with processor-specific optimizations (although it will have to be reshaped into a cube), and that Debian should therefore adapt the gentoo "portage" system into dpkg;
   * 1 to complain that the new lightbulb lacks fairings;
* 9 (including the bugs submitters) to ask "what is testing-proposed-updates"; * 75 to complain about the lights being out two weeks after the bulb has been changed.

and for a total count of 996:

   * 1 to report whole story in -curiosa
   * 2 to comment on it

Mike

--
p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!


[Index of Archives]     [Current Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux