Hi, > Personally, when dealing with very active lists and following the > thread, top posting is a time saver. It isn't. Imagine a situation where you have two (or more) questions with similar but different answers. Top post the answer and you don't know what is being referred to which leads to wide scale confusion. Top posting is NEVER a timesaver. Do you answer the phone by answering a point or question before you've heard what is being asked? > I think this falls into the realm > of personal preference, some people like it, some not.... Some people also like email signatures which follow "-- ". Seems your email client is somewhat broken - like the argument for top-posting. TTFN Paul -- "It is often said that something cannot be libel if it is the truth. This has had to be amended to 'something cannot be libel if it is the truth or if the bank balance says otherwise'" - US Today
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
